The Supreme Court Asked Can Agricultural Laws Be Curbed Till The Hearing Is Over

The Supreme Court on Thursday heard Attorney General K.K. Asked Venugopal whether the central government could put a check on the recently implemented agricultural laws until the court heard the matter? The apex court also emphasised that unless a solution is found to end the deadlock, the police should not take any steps to incite the protestors to violence. Read Indian Hindi news and Bollywood Hindi news with latest update.

Chief Justice S.A. A bench headed by Bobdey told the Attorney General (AG), "Can you assure the court that you will not enforce the law unless we are hearing it." "

However, the apex court also clarified that it is not taking the opinion of the law to stay, but instead it is giving the centre and the farmers unions a chance to explore the possibility of fruitful talks.

The bench also clarified that it is not going to pass any order without hearing the farmers ' unions protesting. At the same time, the bench asked the AG whether there is any assurance in the meantime that there will be no executive action?

The AG responded by saying, "What kind of executive action are you talking about?" He said that if this happens, the farmers will not come for talks. On this, the Chief Justice reiterated that the talks have to be effective. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta objected to the apex Court's suggestion.

The attorney general said that the farmers are adamant and unless all the three laws are repealed, they do not want to negotiate. The Chief Justice replied that he would say that you are adamant and that is why the apex court wants a discussion on it.

The bench also said that the police should not adopt any violent method against the farmers protesting on the borders of Delhi. "We do not raise any questions about opposing, balancing or stopping the law," the Chief Justice said. We need to see that it is not affecting anybody's life. "

Senior advocate Harish Salway was present on behalf of the petitioner against the blockade of farmers on the borders.

The bench said, it accepts that farmers have a right to oppose and the court will not interfere in their right to protest, but it will definitely take note of the modalities of protest.

The bench emphasised that if the farmers and the government do not talk to each other, no conclusion can be found. The bench asked Attorney General K.K. "We are thinking of creating an independent committee to listen to both sides," Venugopal said. Meanwhile, the bench asserted that the centre should ensure that the police are not involved in any kind of violence.

The bench asserted that it cannot curb the right to oppose. The court said that farmers have the right to protest against the law, but it should also be clear that this right does not violate the fundamental right of other citizens.

The bench scrapped the hearing without passing any order and gave the parties the freedom to plough before the vacation bench.

Report this Page