Information about Economic and Financial Criminal commission(EFCC)

The Economic and Financial Criminal commission(EFCC) has advised the representative of the Individuals Democratic Celebration (PDP), Olisa Metuh, to disprove the accusations of scams and cash washing against him rather than aiming to malign the assess with the aim of scuttling his analyze.

The EFCC suggested that Metuh’s unverified accusations of prejudice against Rights Okon Abang of the Government Great Judge, Abuja, and his report that they (Metuh and Rights Abang) were partners at the Law University do not represent a good floor to  ask the assess to stop the analyze .

EFCC is defending Metuh and Destra Financial commitment Restricted on a seven-count cost of scams and cash washing with regards to the N400 thousand he supposedly obtained illegitimately from ex-National Protection Advisor (NSA) Sambo Dasuki and the $2 thousand he supposedly got as present at the last PDP nationwide conference where ex-President Goodluck Jonathan was implemented as the party’s only applicant for the last selection.

They have been on analyze in Rights Abang’s court since Jan 15 until the legal prosecution shut its situation after contacting eight witnesses, who were cross-examined by defense attorneys.

The EFCC, in its reverse affidavit against their  movement for the assess to stop and another for everlasting adjournment until the resolution of their program at the Judge of Attraction for a stay of procedures at the Government Great Judge, suggested that Metuh EFCC and his organization were trying to scuttle the analyze.

Lead legal prosecution attorney Sylvanus Tahir mentioned, in his published distribution to the reverse affidavit, that the accusations of prejudice and other statements by Metuh and Detra were meant to irritate the analyze as they had presented to the court’s authority even when Metuh realized he was the judge’s schoolmate.

“All way of accusations, as mentioned by the offenders, was prepared up by them just to rationalize annoying the slowing down of procedures. We publish that the maneuvers and gadgets implemented by the offenders are nothing but simple postscript and genuine blackmail targeted at overwhelming a legal court to fall the situation in the guise or pretext of prejudice by the assess.

“The accusations of prejudice leveled by the offenders against a legal court associate merely to the exercise of legal abilities by a legal court, without any proof information or conditions that declare that a legal court did, in fact, favor one side badly,” Tahiir said.

On Metuh’s report that he was the judge’s school partner, Tahir suggested that due to the pledge of office signed up to by a legal official, a assess managing situation was only needed to manage justice without worry or favor, regardless of events engaged.

 According to the defending advice Rotimi Jacobs (SAN) while at yesterday’s listening to, he said Dasuki Gates rejected to come to a legal judge because his cause advice would be missing.