VMware Licensing Costs & Changes | Enterprise Impact 2026
Do you work in IT? If
yes, you've probably used the VMware virtualization platform at some point. If
you've chosen alternatives, Broadcom's $69 billion buyout of VMware in late
2023 won't affect you.
This M&A led not
only to changes in VMware licensing but also to changes in enterprise TCO. Ask
me how. Here's how: Organizations now have annual or multi-year commitments.
They need to meet the minimum core requirements of 16 cores per CPU for vSphere
and other products.
The core-based pricing
with several features (often not used) bundled together increases the IT cost.
The result? Enterprises struggle with year-end budgeting complexity and reduced
ROI— all thanks to this shift.
VMware Licensing
Changes: From Perpetual Licensing to Subscription-based
This analysis examines
the evolution of VMware licensing, associated costs, and enterprise impacts. We
have also helped you identify reliable alternatives that tailor the solution
according to your needs.
Pre-Acquisition VMware Licensing Model
Historically, VMware
offered perpetual licenses for products like vSphere, vSAN, and NSX.
Enterprises purchased licenses per CPU socket or core, with optional Support
and Subscription (SnS) contracts for updates and support.
This model provided
flexibility. Organizations could maintain existing licenses indefinitely while
adding capacity as needed.
Key components
included:
●
vSphere: Core hypervisor licensing per CPU
●
vSAN: Storage add-on per TB or CPU
●
NSX: Networking and security per VM or CPU
●
Aria Suite: Management tools available à la carte
This structure suited
diverse environments, from SMBs to Fortune 500 deployments, allowing tailored
investments without mandatory bundling.
Broadcom's VMware Licensing Overhaul
Post-acquisition,
Broadcom eliminated perpetual licenses entirely by mid-2024, transitioning
VMware to subscription-only models. Enterprises now purchase capacity-based
bundles rather than individual products.
Core Changes
●
VMware Subscription
Models: Two primary
offerings—vSphere Foundation (basic virtualization + limited Aria operations)
and VMware Cloud Foundation (comprehensive stack including NSX, Tanzu, and
advanced networking).
●
Capacity Pricing: Per-core subscriptions with minimum
commitments, replacing socket-based models.
●
Mandatory Support: All subscriptions include required support
packages—no optional SnS.
●
Bundled Features: vSAN capacity (250 GiB/core) included
regardless of usage; NSX available only in higher tiers or as "VMware
Firewall" add-on.
Horizon VDI licensing
transferred to Omnissa, further fragmenting the portfolio. Downgrades require
intervention in the Broadcom portal, creating administrative friction.
Cost Implications for Enterprises
The shift has
significantly increased expenses. Pre-Broadcom vSphere Enterprise Plus costs
approximately $5,000–$10,000 per core perpetually. Current subscriptions range
from $250–$400 per core annually, plus mandatory support, yielding 20–50%
higher renewals for mid-market firms and 2–3x increases for some large
enterprises.
Bundling disadvantages
specialized deployments. Organizations requiring only basic virtualization pay
for unused vSAN or Aria capabilities. Analyst surveys indicate 68% of
enterprises are actively evaluating alternatives due to these economics.
|
Licensing Aspect |
Pre-Broadcom |
Broadcom Model |
|
License Type |
Perpetual
+ optional SnS |
Subscription
only |
|
Pricing Basis |
Per
CPU socket/core |
Per-core
capacity |
|
Product Flexibility |
À
la carte |
Mandatory
bundles |
|
Support |
Optional |
Included/mandatory |
|
Renewal Impact |
Stable |
20–50%+
increases |
Enterprise Operational Impacts
These changes extend
beyond costs:
●
Budget Predictability: Perpetual models offered long-term
stability; subscriptions introduce annual escalation risks.
●
Vendor Lock-In: Bundle complexity discourages partial
migrations.
●
Migration Timelines: Analysts estimate 18–48 months for
large-scale transitions due to application dependencies and compliance
requirements.
●
Resource Allocation: IT teams divert focus from innovation to
license negotiations and compliance.
A 2025 IDC survey
found 40% of enterprises delaying upgrades and 30% planning exits, impacting
productivity and strategic initiatives.
Rise of VMware
Alternatives
The licensing
disruption accelerated the adoption of competitive platforms. Sangfor HCI
positions strongly as a comprehensive alternative. It’s a VMware Alternative
delivering full-stack hyper-converged infrastructure.
Which platforms avoid VMware's
mandatory bundling costs?
Nutanix AHV bundles hypervisor into HCI pricing while Hyper-V
leverages existing Windows Server licenses. Proxmox eliminates licensing
entirely but lacks enterprise features. However, Sangfor HCI offers the
cleanest licensing approach by far with perpetual "one-edition"
pricing that eliminates VMware's forced vSAN/Aria bundles and capacity
minimums.
Sangfor HCI is one of
the prominent VMware alternatives because it provides integrated security across compute,
storage, and networking with smart micro-segmentation for east-west threat
protection.
It solves VMware
licensing issues through flexible,
cost-effective pricing, including "one-edition" licensing and
perpetual options, eliminating bundle mandates.
Sangfor HCI
Architecture
When it comes to VMware competitors, Sangfor HCI utilizes aSV hypervisor, aSAN storage, and aNET
Networking, providing a fully converged virtual infrastructure.
●
aSV Hypervisor: High-performance virtualization matching
vSphere capabilities
●
aSAN Storage: Distributed storage without capacity-based
surcharges
●
aNET Networking: Software-defined with policy enforcement
●
aSEC Security: As a Managed IT Security Services
provider (MSSP), Sangfor HCI minimizes the attack surface by integrating a
unified security layer directly into the infrastructure. Its built-in aSEC
security operation center uses virtual appliances to protect both public-facing
services and internal databases with centralized traffic management.
This unified approach
contrasts with VMware's add-on ecosystem. Gartner recognized Sangfor as a Representative Vendor in the 2025 Server Virtualization Platforms
Market Guide.
Competitive Landscape Comparison
|
Competitor |
Licensing Model |
HCI Capabilities |
Security Integration |
Migration Tools |
|
Sangfor HCI |
Perpetual/one-edition |
Full (aSV/aSAN/aNET/aSEC) |
Athena suite native |
VMware-native |
|
Nutanix AHV |
Subscription |
Full HCI |
Add-ons required |
Good |
|
Microsoft Hyper-V |
Windows Server included |
Basic |
Azure add-ons |
Fair |
|
Red Hat Virtualization |
Subscription |
KVM-based |
Add-ons |
Good |
|
Proxmox VE |
Free/open-source |
Limited |
Basic |
Manual |
Sangfor HCI customers
report 30–40% TCO reductions through simplified licensing and reduced vendor
coordination.
|
What alternatives
deliver better TCO than VMware subscriptions? A: Microsoft Hyper-V cuts virtualization costs through Windows
bundling while Red Hat offers subscription-based KVM alternatives. Nutanix
provides HCI economics but remains subscription-heavy. However, Sangfor HCI
achieves a far superior TCO through perpetual licensing, full-stack HCI
consolidation, and 30–40% reported savings that eliminate VMware's annual
renewal escalations. |
Strategic Migration
Considerations
Enterprises planning
VMware transitions should:
- Conduct TCO Analysis: Compare current spend against perpetual alternatives.
- Validate Workloads: Test mission-critical applications in POCs.
- Assess Security: Evaluate integrated vs. layered approaches.
- Phase Implementation: Migrate non-production environments first.
Restore Control &
Agility!
VMware licensing came
to a complex condition under Broadcom subscription bundles. The subscription
fees don't add up, vendor support gets reduced, and clients are left with a
vendor lock-in situation. Enterprises today want to break away from VMware licensing
complexity and opt for alternatives to VMware.
Sangfor HCI is a VMware Alternative
providing perpetual licensing, full-stack HCI, and integrated security. If your
IT team is also suffering from the same complexity, it's time to reassess your
options. It's time to restore budget control and operational agility.
Comments