Articles

Browse Articles  »  Legal  »  Corporate Lawyer on India's Setback at BRICS...

Corporate Lawyer on India's Setback at BRICS Summit

by Abhinav K. Digital Marketing Expert, Freelance

India is badly smitten with terrorist activities, both internal and external disturbances are badly affecting the country's infrastructure and economic growth. Our neighbours are frequently violating the peace pact. Many a times India tried to attract the attention of the United Nations, but couldn't get a significant success in this regard. Not only  India failed to make an impact at UN in this regard, but our approach also seemed weak on various other platforms like G-20 ad BRICS. In the recently concluded BRICS Summit that held in India the efforts made by our representative couldn't get expected support from the other nations including Russia.

Although India redresses the problems that the country is experiencing from the soil of Pakistan, a country which was responsible for various brutal terror attacks in the past is the base of Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi, the mastermind of 26/11 Mumbai attack. This man is living freely in the Pakistan. In its war at fight against terrorism, India tried to get the favor of the BRICS countries under the UN Security Council resolution 1267. India has cited this once again at the BRICS Summit and demanded the handover of 26/11 mastermind. Unfortunately, like our previous experiences we were unheard and ignored because China had already opposed it in the UN.

UN Security Council resolution 1267 is an effective tool to get foreign support in fighting with the terrorism. Imposition 1267 means freezing the funds and other assets of the culprit, designated individuals and groups, restriction on the mobility of accused and banning the activities which include the sale and purchase of arms and weapons. Everyone understands India's problems, but no one is sincere enough to help India in her war against terrorism. Where we are lacking? The prime reason is that India didn't sign extradition treaty with various countries in the world, and this is really a big issue. 

According to Mr. Kislay Pandey, Corporate Lawyer at the Supreme Court of India, "The country which always followed the NAM principles couldn't develop a robust relationship with the developed and big economies of the world. Lobbying has its own benefits in developing and maintaining relations. In present times there is a trend of alliances and group building among the like minded nations on political and economic issues, such associations help a country in raising its issue and getting immediate support from the allied. The European Union is the best example in this regard."

Sponsor Ads


About Abhinav K. Magnate I     Digital Marketing Expert, Freelance

3,666 connections, 72 recommendations, 9,073 honor points.
Joined APSense since, November 11th, 2011, From New Delhi, India.

Created on Dec 31st 1969 18:00. Viewed 0 times.

Comments

No comment, be the first to comment.
Please sign in before you comment.