Is it true that the leading cause for divorce is marriage?

"Yes, I'm afraid that is so. Modern history doesn't know any cases of..." Hmmm, a self-proclaimed expert. This ought to be good.

Sender W. - If life were a disease —and especially one with a 100% lethal outcome, as you baselessly claim— it would have killed itself out of existence not long after it began, hundreds of millions of years ago. Life is not a disease; hatred of life is a disease. That's why there are psychiatrists. You call yourself a researcher. Why not research why you ar

Yes, I'm afraid that is so. Modern history doesn't know any cases of divorce without a previous marriage.

Totally agree with Alexandru P.:
Life is a sexually transmitted disease that has a 100% lethal outcome

There is a merit here. While the question may be begging, a careful look or dissection might shed some light. To start off, has anyone wondered why a simple relation as boyfriend-girlfriend tend to last longer than most marriages and everything is copacetic until marriage is effected, then everything starts falling apart from the seams.

There is a degree of overburdening imposed by a political system which should have no business in social matters like marriage. The regulation of marriage by g

This is really a question or joke

The leading cause for divorce is the lack of a true marriage, give and take, love, sexual, ....

Researchers Without Purpose must be a joke.

No, because of couple didn't not suite to be together

Yes. Without marriage, divorce would not be necessary.

Just like the leading cause for death is birth...