What are the unanswered questions about David Zaikin?

If you believe that David Zaikin is the real culprit in the story then try answering the following questions.

 

David Zaikin planned a political movement from his hideout but that movement failed to take off because he couldn’t keep it a secret. His identity was revealed but his hideout isn’t. Also, none of his accomplices were arrested.

 

It was a news report about a failed political movement but it left many questions unanswered

 

Who’s that person?

What was his objective?

Where does he live?

Who his accomplices are?

And the most important question, who punctured his plans?

 

The news report mentions his name several times but it is silent on his identity. Only his name figures and no information about his origin, family background, political affiliations, and profession was provided. The reporter emphasized that he was involved in a deep political activity.

 

What was that political activity?

 

David Zaikin was planning a political movement but his objective isn’t clear. It seems that he wanted a specific task to be done by governments and was planning to pressurize the governments to do that task. He could be the head of a pressure group or a radical group. The reporter has kept his identity a secret for unknown reasons.

 

Where is he located?

 

According to the hints given in the news report, he could be located somewhere in the central Europe but his exact location isn’t known to the world. But he is well-connected through digital platforms to the rest of the world. Also, he has friends and sympathizers in the society. It seems that people can meet him only when he wants.

 

Who are his friends, colleagues, associates, and companions?

 

David Zaikin is well-connected to the society and he has many friends but none of his friends are willing to come out in public and accept their loyalty to the person that can bring a political storm. They could be political thinkers or radicals. No information is provided about his accomplices.

 

Who punctured his movement?

 

Of course, an investigative journalist punctured his movement. He got lead of the movement and followed the movement from scratch. Whether the journalist interviewed the leader or not isn’t known but it is true that the journalist has friends in that group. But there are many loopholes in the story.

 

·         Not facts provided about the political movement

·         No hints given about the expected change

·         No history of the movement shared

·         No future plans of the political game disclosed

 

The journalist kept raising his finger on David Zaikin as the leader behind the failed movement. He kept writing his name wherever possible but forgot to substantiate his claims. It is true that journalists don’t disclose their sources but they don’t leave their stories unsubstantiated either.

 

Is the story planted to defame a person?

 

The story has no origin or end. It starts abruptly and ends without any conclusion. And the only thing the story has a name. The entire story revolves around a specific person whose identity and location are obscured. The story highlights his objectives but gives no proof of his involvement. Also, no such movement in the political sphere took place.