Police Reform is Misguided

I believe there's a growing group of nonconformists who believe Americans can survive without law enforcement as we know it. And some Americans believe, may even be better off without it. This is misguided. It is an emotional response to a mob mentality.

The solution to police brutality and racial inequalities in policing is simple, supporters say: Just defund police. But that is wrong. However, I do agree that it is a simple solution: Police Officers need to start public campaigns and protests to share how the police departments use intimidation tactics to threaten their officers to enforce laws, curfews, social distancing ordinances, etc that erode the moral fabric of society and create a devise divide between the police and the public as a whole. How when an officer wants to stand up against their department, they are told, “That the job has a funny way at getting back at officers like you.” I know cause it happened to me in my law enforcement career with the NYPD. Officers with a family, real bills, health care necessities and in need of a job are left hopeless and trapped. Reforming the establishment and seeking approval for progressive thinking strategies on how an officer can do his job better is like trying to change the current of the ocean with a cup. We as a society have advanced our businesses with the utilization of technology, so why is the upper hierarchy of police departments remained antiquated, out of touch with modern day society and barriers to reform.

Perhaps the rank and file of officers should take note and follow the protesters lead, standing up to their departments, affording the public the opportunity to know and understand what its really like to be a police officer. It time to start public campaigns and protests to share how the police departments use intimidation tactics to threaten their officers to enforce laws, curfews, social distancing ordinances, etc that erode the moral fabric of society and create a devise divide between the police and the public as a whole. How police departments find themselves the defendant of Equal Employment Opportunity claims and Fair Labor Standards Act suits brought against them by their officers.

How the departments hire 21 year old officers whom may have achieved high grades in college but never held down a job so they posses no life experience and expect them to be a role model, a social worker, a priest, a counselor, a fireman when necessary, a tour guide, a psychiatrist, a humanitarian, a medical worker (rendering first aid or delivering a baby) all the while standing tall while impartially enforcing the law. The officer is asked to run toward the danger or gunshots and engage a subject that is threatening the officer’s or another person life and make a millisecond decision that will be Monday morning quarterbacked by all and may result in the taking of someone’s life or the officer going to jail for a millisecond decision that others will have months if not years to pontificate over.

Most of the training they are given is to limit liability on their department. Navy seals train under practical high stress scenarios that have a direct relationship to the types of environments that they will be deployed to. There is little to no training on practical high stress real life scenario to prepare officers.

In summary there’s a gap between training, departments message to their officers, the manner of how they want their officers to enforce laws and what really happens out on the street our intention should be to narrow that gap.

As a senior executive of Strategic Security Corp. (SSC), a WBE, MBE, SDVOB founded in 2002, a nationwide integrated solutions provider with 7 regional offices, 56 branch offices and over 3,500 employees specializing in Guard Services, Emergency Response, Labor and Civil Unrest, Integrated Technology, AI and Temporary Life Support Facilities, Strategic has recognized the potential results of the deep state of de-policing all corporations across every industries and the nation as a whole faces.

This social movement of de-policing derives in part from the media’s narrative of police misconduct and wrongdoing, making people feel as though it became socially acceptable to challenge and discredit law enforcement actions. A study by the FBI titled “Analyzing the State of U.S. Policing,” asserted that these circumstances have demoralized police officers, causing them to do less—an issue commonly referred to as “de-policing.”

Ever since Ferguson in 2014, de-policing has been defined in terms of “dissent shirking,” where not working serves as an emotionally led form of silent protest. Now in the wake of George Floyd’s death, the Black Lives Matter, reform and or de-fund the police movement across the nation is creating even bigger risks to all corporations across

Sponsor Ads

• Ad Space Available - Rent it Now!

Report this Page

Created on Jun 14th 2020 09:38. Viewed 74 times.

Share on APSense

Comments