Is Strategic UK Land a Real Asset Worth Investing In?
Real
assets can provide real rewards, but some investments are subject to odd
volatility. Strategic land has many solid economic factors in its favour.
It’s understandable that
investors might be skittish about investing in real
assets. Price volatility is almost the norm for such investments as
precious metals, antiques, art and classic cars. Some antique cars rose in value
by 257 per cent between 2005 and 2013 (source: Coutts private bank), however
that assumes you pick the right model and year, and that your garage and
insurance costs are not exorbitant. In February 2015, ten international banks
were named by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission for possible rigging of precious metals markets, according to The Wall Street Journal. Real assets sometimes come with
real problems.
But we are in an era
where UK land, the historically
most dependable real asset, is in a class by itself. With little reservation,
most investment advisors see a great deal of value growth in strategic land –
enough so that any investment portfolio of a good size should allow room for strategic
land investments.
There are several reasons
for this. Here are the key factors favouring good returns on the strategic
conversion of raw land to housing:
- Shortage of
housing – New housing starts in England
in 2014 numbered 137,780, up from 112,610 in 2013 – a 22 per cent
increase. But the Department for Communities and Local Government
estimates the annual addition of new homes should be 221,000 units, and
that the country is already one million residences shy of where we should
have.
- Growing
population – There are several reasons for
this shortage of homes. But chief among them is the growing UK population,
found to have increased a stunning 7 per cent from 2001 to 2011. This is
due to immigration, higher birthrates and extended lifespans, where our
pensioners are able to stay in their family homes longer than before.
- Shifting
sentiments toward expanding housing – A YouGov poll taken around the time of the
2015 General Election found that 67 per cent of adults in England believe
that the number of new homes being built should increase. But exactly
where those homes should be located is a point of disagreement and,
perhaps, some confusion. That same percentage of the 4,500 people polled
feel it’s important to protect Green Belt land from development, and even
more (83 per cent) think that building on brownfield land should be
supported. But when asked about building on greenfield land – distinguished not by location but by having never been built upon –
more than half do not oppose building there. There is widespread
misperception that Green Belt is universally areas of outstanding beauty,
when in fact much of it is not. Further, if housing is located beyond the
official Green Belts it creates an exurbia phenomenon that requires
greater commuting distances, which is precisely what Green Belts are
supposed to prevent. In some cities, swaps of brownfield land are being
made with Green Belt acreage, enabling parks within the urban core and
expanded housing where it is in close range of workplaces.
- Alleviate
strain of unaffordable housing – The housing charity Shelter maintains that
increasing the housing stock at all price levels alleviates price pressure
at the lowest levels, reducing rough sleeping and making rents more
affordable for young families.
- Government-sponsored
lending assists – With the
successful Help-to-Buy programme, first-time home buyers are able to get
the deposits and loans necessary to get on the property ladder. At least
70,000 homes were purchased in 2014 under Help-to-Buy.
As should be evident,
societal as well as economic factors favour investing in home building. Managers
of UK
property funds, who identify land that is ripe for use designation changes,
lead these efforts on behalf of investors. Once the land is approved for a use
change by local planning authorities, they construct infrastructure that
provides lots for individual home construction, typically by homebuilder firms.
Should you invest in a real asset of any kind, including strategic land? It’s best to consult with an independent financial advisor who can assess where in your portfolio such an investment might fit.
Post Your Ad Here
Comments