Cloudflare vs Cloudinary

Many people may already be familiar with CloudFlare, a web service that makes us safer and faster to access. Well recently I've discussed cloudinary, my first chance to try the new cloudinary followed by CloudFlare, why? because unlike cloudinary, CloudFlare settings-that serve no particular settings and I think it's a bit complex for the novice user. Unlike the cloudinary, just store our data there then our content will be distributed through high delivery performance through the CDN. Of course, to get maximum results from both of these services we have to pay the subscription on a monthly basis alias, since my fund are limited and just want to know who is impacted significantly on our website, so it's good sign that the free version first. Here are the features they promised:

Coudinary

Smart Image Management
Easy migration and administration with Full API
Reduce Development Costs and Time
Improve User Experience and Website Performance
and much more

on CloudFlare
loads twice as fast
uses 60% less bandwidth
has 65% fewer requests
is way more secure
and much more
 

For the first web use Cloudinary and a little tune-up on file html, javascript and css it, the second web using CloudFlare assistance with setting web standards using the standard WordPress plugins such as Akismet, WP-Cache plugin and 2 others, for web The third is still the same using WordPress but do not use CloudFlare cloudinary or, as is normal with 3 active plugins.

The same is the third of this website is at the webserver and tested on the same server.

The following screenshot website speed test results using pingdomtool service.

From the test results in a "rough" look that excels with speed cloudinary 312.03kB / s with 40request / s, and CloudFlare only 176.69kB /s and 32.3request / s.

And if the standard website for comparison only produce 167.64kB /s with 13.7request / s.

So tentative conclusion that can be drawn are:

By using our website Cloudinary performance will increase significantly compared with CloudFlare
Unlike the case with cloudinary which limits its free account with 500MB of storage and bandwidth that storage and 1GB bandwidth, Clodflare no storage and bandwidth restrictions because in principle CloudFlare accelerates our website by "optimizing" control us but he was also using a CDN.
Use one of these services than nothing.
My advice to my self: Cloudinary use to store files that are loaded on our landing page but ... do not file a large, fairly small files such as logos, icons, etc. as if the file had been placed there 1GB guaranteed bandwidth will quickly run less of the month.

Well that thoughts now what if Cloudinary and CloudFlare mated? use the CDN edge on Cloudinary and optimizing the CloudFlare DNS ... so curious.

# Grinned.

Approximately what would the faster or gonna crash ?