Comparison Of Blazor Vs JavaScript Frameworks

The ASP.NET team recently developed a new framework called Blazor. Blazor comes with a unique selling point which is where you can develop a rich web UI experience. All this can be done using HTML, CSS, and C# instead of old JavaScript.

 

A lot of developers wanted this to happen. Blazor lets you work on the UI framework for the client-side. For a long time, Javascript has been used to write the UI and development of the front end. But, the developers were not very keen on using JavaScript since it required a lot of transpilers for various languages to work in tandem.

The advantages that Blazor has to offer can be seen only when its architect and model are fully comprehended. Blazor treats the UI changes and the application of the changes in different ways. This is the reason why Blazor stands out from other UI frameworks like Angular, ReactJS/React Native. These tools can be used to develop UI for web technologies.

 

Blazor offers access to different renderers. Hence, it becomes easy for the developers to develop UI not only for web-based applications but also for native mobile apps. To accomplish this, the components of Blazor work in a different way. This implies that the components the developers use for mobile app renderers cannot be used to develop the web app renderers. But, the programming model underneath remains the same.

The Blazor server hosting model is the only component that is production-oriented as far as blazor development is concerned. When we talk about this model, the Blazor application runs on the server above the .NET core runtime. As the user installs the application, a small JavaScript file gets downloaded that establishes a two-way SignalR connection with the server.

Blazor Webassembly is the reason why Blazor can stand strongly against JavaScript SPA like Angular, VueJS, and React. With Blazor Webassembly, the developer can write the UI logic using C# instead of JavaScript. As you start working with Webassembly, a small version of Mono .NET runtime gets downloaded to the client’s browser.

 

It also downloads the application DLL files and other dependencies. Once everything is perfectly downloaded in the browser, the Mono runtime gets bootstrapped. This in turn installs and executes the application DLLs.

Looking at the benefits and features Microsoft Blazor has to offer, it may seem like Blazor will replace Javascript.

React is known to have the best library for the development of a web component. In addition to this, the community that surrounds React is very strong. React also comes with massive libraries and frameworks that help with the development of optimized React apps.

 

Libraries ensured that React becomes a universal language. This made sure that it was capable of aiding the development of apps for web, CLI, mobile, Windows, and more. It also paired up with component sharing tools that made React almost irreplaceable.

 

When it comes to Microsoft Blazor, the development is conducted using C# which makes it an easier transition for the .NET developer. Similar to React, Blazor also comes with its trailblazing advantages for the developer to explore:

If your development team is well versed with Javascript, then you should stick with it. But if your team is well versed with .NET, then Blazor should be a good option for you to consider.

Microsoft Blazor is still under development and may replace JavaScript once it is fully functional for the developers. It provides a unified platform for the development of all kinds of apps which makes it easier for the developers.

Report this Page