The strategy of a company: proactive or reactive?by Abdul Rimaaz Abdul Rimaaz Business Consultants UK
Proactive and reactive strategies are two strategies that are widely used by various organizations. Both strategies are necessary for the success of a long-term business.
The proactive strategies are essentially those strategies that companies use to anticipate future requirements and potential challenges and threats of a company, and take steps to address these needs and threats before they actually experience.
The reactive strategies are those used by companies in response to a subsequent sudden this:
· Companies develop these strategies to respond to an internal or external situation that has already occurred or is occurring at that time.
In order to identify the precise combination of proactive and reactive strategies that companies must use, internal reviews and precise estimation of trends are required, as well as the particular actions that must be taken under each type of strategy.
Definitions and explanations
A proactive approach to developing strategies focuses on planning for the future. The basis of these strategies is the anticipation of threats, challenges and opportunities in the business environment.
Additionally, Abdul Rimaaz strategies help identify and avoid potential hazards before they are actually experienced. Therefore, proactive strategies help to predict the future and, therefore, to obtain better results.
Additionally, these strategies often view the organization in a more analytical way, taking into account various factors such as market conditions, customer complaints, accidents, unnecessary costs, high job turnover, and claims.
It is often observed that companies that focus on a proactive approach are more effective at solving problems and meeting challenges. Those organizations that take a proactive approach are focused on the goal.
In such organizations, goals are assigned and progress is reviewed from time to time.
· These organizations evaluate the markets, products and behavior of competitors and focus on innovation.
· They focus on customer satisfaction and receive regular feedback from customers.
When proactive strategies are used, the resources the company spends on 'crisis management' decreases, allowing it to focus more on its mission.
The proactive approach also offers a competitive advantage, as the company is positioned as a leader in meeting customer requirements.
However, when there is too much focus on proactive strategies, and when expected trends are not predicted correctly or when anticipated events do not occur, the company's resources spent on such planning will be wasted.
This is where reactive strategies come in, as explained below.
A reactive strategy is one in which problems are handled after they have occurred. When an organization takes a reactive approach, it does not plan for the long term.
Sometimes organizations experience unexpected problems, which can be internal or external to the organization. In such situations, companies must react quickly to minimize loss and damage.
This is when organizations use reactive strategies.
A reactive organization does not formulate plans for the future. However, when faced with an emergency situation, you develop contingency plans to manage it.
In a reactive organization, top management takes an autocratic approach. These organizations do not analyze the competition in the market and the competitor's products. Rather, the focus is on following knee-jerk sentiment when addressing issues rather than conducting a comprehensive analysis of the situation.
Reactive strategies reduce unnecessary efforts and resources wasted on planning activities. However, when a reactive approach is taken, the organization shows a slow response and often misses new and emerging opportunities in the market.
When the industry is competitive, this can decrease the company's market share, while also negatively affecting the growth of the company.
The strategy of a company: proactive or reactive?
Difference between proactive strategies and reactive strategies
The main difference between proactive strategies and reactive strategies is given below:
Proactive strategies are those that are used by companies to anticipate challenges, threats and opportunities in the market, while reactive strategies are those that are used by companies to deal with an unforeseen situation after it has occurred.
The purpose of the proactive strategy is to respond to anticipated challenges, while the reactive strategy helps to handle unforeseen events.
Proactive strategies are applicable to the threats, opportunities and challenges that a company expects to occur in the future. On the other hand, reactive strategies are applicable for problems that occur in the present.
4. Crisis management
Proactive strategies reduce a company's 'crisis management' efforts, while reactive organizations only react after a crisis has occurred.
Conclusion: proactive versus reactive strategies
The proactive strategy differs from the reactive strategy mainly in that the proactive strategy is used for the future, while the reactive strategy is used for events that take place in the present.
Companies that have taken a proactive approach anticipate a problem and look for ways to find solutions. However, the opposite occurs in a reactive strategy. Businesses face the problem right then and there.
Companies that emphasize proactive strategy are often able to meet challenges more effectively. These strategies allow companies to formulate their own decisions rather than react out of necessity in circumstances that are probably not within their control.
However, companies sometimes run into problems, especially in the external environment, that they cannot avoid. In such situations, a quick response is required and proactive planning is not helpful. Therefore, reactive strategies are required along with proactive strategies to mitigate problems and maintain success.
Created on Nov 18th 2020 00:44. Viewed 181 times.