Flutter, React Native, or Xamarin. What is the best framework to develop a mobile application?
Every day we all use mobile
phones to make purchases, pay bills, access our bank account and manage our
social networks. And all these operations are carried out while we are
frequently on the go.
When we develop a mobile
application, we want to improve the user experience while using our app and
improve our ROI as a company.
With all this, we always have
the question of what is the best platform to use to build a useful mobile
application.
According to the technology
used, mobile applications are classified into native applications, mobile web
applications, or hybrid applications. Most of the applications are integrated
into Hybrid, a multi platform solution that perfectly fits our business's
requirements.
As cross-platform hybrid
solutions, we have several tools available:
● Xamarin
● React
Native
● Flutter
● Ionic
Next, we will try to clarify the
pros and cons of each of them, comparing different characteristics to help us
make the best decision according to our business's requirements.
A quick look at React Native
Introduced by Facebook in 2015,
React Native emerged as a cross-platform application development technology,
using JavaScript to create a native mobile application.
Pros
of React Native
● React Dashboard
offers several ready-to-apply elements that can speed up development time.
● Hot
reload: we can supply our application quickly without recompiling.
● Direct
use of native code to optimize our application to a high level.
● Shared
code on both platforms: iOS and Android.
● Faster
application development with precast elements.
● Access
to native functionalities such as camera, accelerometer, etc.
● High-quality
mobile UI.
Cons
of React Native
● Mobile
app navigation would not be equivalent to native navigation. The navigation
designed in React Native is not so smooth.
● Like
Xamarin, React Dashboard even allows us to develop higher-quality applications.
But apps built with React Native are slower than native Android apps built with
Java and native iOS apps built with Objective-C and Swift.
A quick look at Flutter
Flutter is the last of these
three main actors to join the game. It allows us to develop multi platform
mobile applications easily and simply.
What
is Flutter?
● It
is a free and open-source platform.
● It
is based on Dart, a fast, object-oriented programming language that is very
easy to learn.
● It
provides us with its particular gadgets, drawn with its superior rendering
engine. They are fast, beautiful, and adjustable.
● Flutter's
architecture is based on reactive programming, which is very popular today.
Flutter
Pros
● Faster
code writing that typically takes seconds helps teams add features, fix bugs,
and experiment faster.
● We
developers only need to write a codebase used for applications that cover the
Android and iOS platforms.
● Having
a similar application for two platforms means that it takes less time for
testing, and the QA process can be faster.
● It
is easy to both create and customize widgets, such as material design widgets
or Cupertino widgets.
● Ideal
for MVP (model view controller), helping us to build the application in less
time.
Cons
of Flutter
● Flutter
is still in beta and has yet to release a stable version.
● It
also doesn't support continuous integration (CI) platforms like Travis or
Jenkins. Therefore, to achieve automatic creation, application testing, and
deployment, our development team needs to use and maintain custom content.
● Flutter
is fully compatible with Google, and there are several useful libraries with
functionalities that are ready to implement. However, Flutter is still not that
rich when it comes to native development.
A quick look at Xamarin
In May 2011, Xamarin was
released and later acquired by Microsoft. Xamarin was intended to address the
pervasive problem of disconnected technology to encourage native applications'
development using its open-source platform.
Xamarin
Pros
● The
framework uses the C # language that works perfectly on many platforms
(Android, iOS, and Windows).
● If
we are building an app for multiple platforms (like Android, iOS, etc.), we can
share or reuse most of your code in the app for the other platforms.
● Native
API access: we can get platform-specific functionalities in your application
● Various
controls and layouts provided in Xamarin help with a faster development process
Cons
of Xamarin
● Limited
access to different libraries vital to building an application using this
framework.
● Xamarin
suffers from low community activity which is not suitable for developing a
framework.
Flutter, React Native or Xamarin
What framework do I choose?
Next, we will compare the
characteristics of each of these frameworks; this will help us to have a
clearer idea in choosing the most suitable environment for our business.
Ease
of learning
Flutter is easy to learn if you
know Dart, Google's object-oriented programming language. We need to create
mobile apps with the help of Dart on Flutter. We may think that learning a new
language will take a long time, but all we need is to understand the basics of
this language. And if we know other languages like JavaScript, everything
will be much easier.
Learning the concepts of React
Native is easy if we are experienced JavaScript developers and have some React
skills. This framework is easy to understand and doesn't require a lot of
effort but it does require JavaScript knowledge.
If we know Android, it is easier
to understand Xamarin because many things are identical, and C # is very
similar to Java. Xamarin can enable us to save up to 70% of development work on
a second mobile platform by reusing code.
Application
speed
When creating a mobile app with
Flutter, we don't have to worry about speed as the framework will give us the
performance that will make us users happy. Like React Native, Flutter is an
excellent decision to develop a faster application. Flutter allows us to use native
code to achieve better performance. Widgets include platform differences such
as scrolling, navigation, and fonts. Therefore, we will have an uninterrupted
understanding of Android and iOS.
React Native offers almost
native performances. So, if we are creating a mobile application with this
framework, our application will be super fast. Also, we can always try to
improve it because application performance is crucial for a successful
business. It allows us to write code in native languages, such as Objective-C,
Java, or Swift. We can even create a part of our application to React Native
while the other part can be built-in Native code.
Additionally, applications that
are built on Xamarin will give us better performance and continuously improve
to match native development standards. With the help of Xamarin, iOS and
Android apps can be fully native apps leveraging each platform. It is quite
similar if we are creating native mobile applications with Xamarin. Forms and
their shared user interface (UI) library. Xamarin Forms 2.0, released as part
of Xamarin 4, includes some new features and updates to help us build fast
applications.
Developer
productivity
The hot reload feature, “Live
Reload,” available in Flutter, can save developers time. There are many widgets
and APIs in Flutter that allow us to complete the application development work
quickly. So, with the help of this framework, developers can work productively
and save a lot of time while creating a mobile application.
This platform is quite advantageous
for companies.
How to React Native gives us the
flexibility to work in any text editor / IDE we want. Therefore, we can choose
a text editor that can save time and money. It offers us a pre-built feature
called “Live Reload” that helps you complete your project faster.
In Xamarin, "Live
Reload" allows developers to implement enhancements to XAML and see them
reflected live, without any compilation or implementation. Because our
application compiles while using “Live Reload,” it works with all third-party
libraries and controls. Live Reload works on all Xamarin platforms. The forms
are compatible with iOS, Android, UWP, and WPF, and they work on all legitimate
deployment targets, including simulators, emulators, and physical devices.
Architecture
The Flutter architecture is very
easy to understand, and even new developers, starting with existing application
code, can easily follow the framework. Flutter's architecture makes teamwork
easy. It supports Flutter's reactive UI approach and never affects Flutter's
performance. RefluxJS and Facebook's Flux awaken a Dart application
architecture library with the one-way data flow. Flutter-flux implements a
one-way data flow pattern involving Actions, Stores, and StoreWatchers. It
depends on w_flux but has been modified to use Flutter instead of React.
The Xamarin architecture
comprises a visual design platform for building native applications such as
test suites, native library support, and a nugget-style component store. The
visual design of iOS has been granted through its IDE to help developers open
X-Code. LINQ can be used with collections or create custom delegates and events
that free developers from the constraints of Objective-C and Java.
What is the best framework?
These three frameworks are great
for developing successful mobile apps. But as you can see, it is tough to
decide which one is the best. We need to think about which framework will be
the most suitable for the development of our mobile application and which one
will best suit our business. Some prefer encoding in React Native while others
prefer Flutter and some consider Xamarin the best option.
Comments