Is it true that the leading cause for divorce is marriage?

Alexandru P.  Internet e-business
Just like the leading cause for death is birth...
Jul 14th 2012 03:20 2 Likes  

Nnamdi Agha   Internet Marketer
Yes. Without marriage, divorce would not be necessary.
Jul 14th 2012 06:26 1 Likes  

Keith Frame   Author and Filmmaker
No, because of couple didn't not suite to be together
Jul 15th 2012 01:16 1 Likes  

David Smith   Website Design, Graphic Design, Internet Marketing
Researchers Without Purpose must be a joke.
Jul 15th 2012 13:58   

Dr Don Y.   MD - Pyrium Web Enterprises Pvt Ltd
The leading cause for divorce is the lack of a true marriage, give and take, love, sexual, ....
Jul 16th 2012 00:42   

Saeed Afridi   Online Marketer
This is really a question or joke
Jul 16th 2012 10:29 2 Likes  

Nii Ahene -La  Online Offline Marketing Consultant
There is a merit here. While the question may be begging, a careful look or dissection might shed some light. To start off, has anyone wondered why a simple relation as boyfriend-girlfriend tend to last longer than most marriages and everything is copacetic until marriage is effected, then everything starts falling apart from the seams.

There is a degree of overburdening imposed by a political system which should have no business in social matters like marriage. The regulation of marriage by government is a major cause of the breakdown we see today. There was less politics in marriage 100 years ago. Of course, there other interference, for example, religion but not as bad because of the fact that couples can ignore religion. The Family and its culture should be central to marriage but not impose any disagreeable terms like forced marriage on anyone.
Jul 16th 2012 12:09 2 Likes  

Alex W.  Writer, Researcher
Yes, I'm afraid that is so. Modern history doesn't know any cases of divorce without a previous marriage.

Totally agree with Alexandru P.:
Life is a sexually transmitted disease that has a 100% lethal outcome
Jul 22nd 2012 08:57 2 Likes  

Truth Revolution  Truth Seeker, Truth Spreader, Lie Basher
"Yes, I'm afraid that is so. Modern history doesn't know any cases of..." Hmmm, a self-proclaimed expert. This ought to be good.

Sender W. - If life were a disease —and especially one with a 100% lethal outcome, as you baselessly claim— it would have killed itself out of existence not long after it began, hundreds of millions of years ago. Life is not a disease; hatred of life is a disease. That's why there are psychiatrists. You call yourself a researcher. Why not research why you are still here, hundreds of millions of years after all life disappeared, being the self-eating disease that you say it is? It may also be healthy for you to research why you are so depressed, as to hate your life.

Life has a 0% lethal outcome. If you believe otherwise, PROVE IT. Show just one case in which life has caused death, other than life-threatening complications at birth, which are extremely rare, considering the whole. Also, give proof that life is a disease. (HINT: You will have to prove that life is basically the opposite of what it is.) And, anyone, show one case in which marriage has caused divorce. It is not at all possible for one to cause the other (marriage/divorce, life/death).

THINK...

For those of you who are still paying no attention to politics, the non-argument that 'marriage causes divorce' is childish homosexual propaganda to make natural unions undesirable. Since nature does not produce homosexuals, homosexuals cannot have natural union. Marriage is based on natural union. Hence the lefts' childish mentality of, "if we can't have it, you can't either" as a tool for the destruction of marriage. The non-argument that 'life is a disease' is communist propaganda to make free humans think of themselves as being incapable and worthless —those who see themselves as being worthless are easy to brainwash, control and eliminate.

Wake up and start paying attention and you will no longer fall for fanatical left-wing self-hatred and racist propaganda.

P.S. Sender W., if life were a disease and it was sexually transmitted, where did it come from? Your claim involves a male and a female, in order to both produce offspring and spread disease. That I am aware of, the only theories on life which have a male and female immediately capable of producing offspring are Creation and Intelligent Design. Strange, most anti-humanists *ironically* claim to believe in Evolution theory, which, of course, is in total disagreement with them, hence the irony. What makes it so hard to see where you're coming from is (besides it's impossibility) that none of the top theories on life agree with you (Creationism, Intelligent Design, Evolution). In fact, they all disagree with you 100%. Do you believe that your unfounded, copy-paste, no-research version of science is going to prove anyone wrong and come out as the leading theory of life's origins and/or destination?
Jul 24th 2012 12:47   

Marty H.  Affiliate Marketing
yes it is true becous i have been there
Jul 24th 2012 21:24   

Truth Revolution  Truth Seeker, Truth Spreader, Lie Basher
So, Marty, your wife left you because you married her? That's your excuse? It's an unlikely one, considering that most women start dreaming about marriage around the age of three or four and spend the rest of their lives fantasizing about their wedding day until it arrives. I imagine her reasoning being something more embarrassing, like erectile dysfunction. But, hey, maybe you got that one chick in existence that never thought about marriage until it happened and, just after being pronounced man and wife, she said, "HA! Now I've got an excuse to leave you!"
Jul 25th 2012 02:03   

Kelly Bryson   Internet Marketer
OOOOOH! Deep question. Technically the answer is yes because you can only divorce if you are married. But, realistically I think society plays the most important role. Our moral and values system has decreased to the point that staying married for years or until death due you part is virtually impossible. Our interests change from day to day. We get caught up in everyday life and keeping up with the Jones to the point that we don't eat, pray, or stay together. How often do you hug your spouse?
Jul 27th 2012 05:58   

Truth Revolution  Truth Seeker, Truth Spreader, Lie Basher
Kelly,

"Technically the answer is yes because you can only divorce if you are married."

True, you cannot get divorced if you're not married. But marriage is not the "CAUSE" of divorce, which was the question.

"Deep question."

I think that's the problem, man. People are trying desperately to make a deep issue out of something that is common sense. It's like the socialists running around America constantly crying "it's too complicated," just because they do not want to think about anything.

What I'd really like to see on this thread is someone give an example of marriage having been the cause of their divorce.
Aug 6th 2012 17:32   

Yuri Nawangsih  Private Teacher
sure, it is. No divorce without a marriage..
Aug 14th 2012 07:51   

Joseph Moran   business, managing consultant
well if everybody agrees with this then why continue doing it. Marriage is a word that is used to describe the things, people are the cause for divorce.
Aug 15th 2012 08:28   

Jessica B.   sales marketing n management
Marriage can cause extra stress to a relationship...it can be acurse.
Aug 23rd 2012 00:30   

Pc Kuril  Online Earner
nop its not true..marriage is a best step between way of life in 2 difrnts people
Aug 24th 2012 01:39   

Crystal Rain  President
Lol.....I don't think so. It is because two people failed to keep their commitment to each other. Better or worse. It is so sad because the grass is not always greener on the other side.
Aug 28th 2012 11:56   

Solusi Mandiri   Consultant
Not Agree.. not all marriage end up with divorce
Aug 29th 2012 03:21   

Platinum Net  Social network of communication platforms
NO
Lack of understanding between the spouses is the main reason
Aug 30th 2012 10:00