Evidence based practice for resourcesby Derrick Corea Technosoft Innovations, Inc
How do you know as a user that a tool works? How do you show
that tools do what they have to do? That they are effective and cost-effective
in terms of insurers and policymakers? So, how does proof work with tools?
When deploying and measuring results of the use of medical devices, you look at things
other than medicines. A tool mainly contributes to resolving a functional
For example: a stoma bag does not help to solve the medical
cause or deviation of the bowel or bladder, but it does make it possible that
you can function without being in the toilet all day, a hearing aid ensures
that you can communicate with you again. People, can understand them again.
Incontinence material ensures that your urine is collected at times when it is
necessary and desirable, you do not suffer from it and it does not smell or
feels. Compression stockings provide better blood circulation, but do not solve
the problem with the vessels in the legs.
All these medical
devices do not solve the medical cause, but can contribute to the healing
process. Even more important; they ensure that you as a human being, patient or
user can (continue to) function better, so that you can do things that you
otherwise could not do because of your illness or condition. See medical product development.
Is subjective assessment
How do you then prove that they work, that they solve what
they are meant for? Evidence is obtained on the basis of the user experiences
and assessment by the expert practitioner. You look at the results in daily
practice that are tested against the expectation. What difference does the use
of that resource solution make for that user? How does the user experience
this? Is that user satisfied does he accept the solution; are there no
complications or imperfections? This way you can evaluate and measure results.
Thus, the burden of proof is obtained in the most objective manner. Collecting
data is essential, but it is based on the right starting points, based on
In the case of device care, you, as a user, will therefore
assess together with the therapist whether the device is working properly. This
can only be assessed when careful and careful consideration is given to the
functioning of the user in own environment. At the same time, the choice of a
certain resource solution is overhauled each time and tested for changes. These
can take place in the environment of the user, the way he is active or in the
circumstances of that user. Think of the occurrence of a complication of
disease / disorder, or after other medication is prescribed.
Standardization of selection process
Tool care is tailor-made and that is not for nothing. And
yes, it is also partly subjective. Every person is different and functions
differently. We should never forget that in tool care. The question that every
user and practitioner asks himself when evaluating whether a tool works: Can I
hear / see / feel / walk / work / laugh / sleep / sit / lie and so on, using
something that I do without or otherwise solution (less or) not good? That
experience, that experience can be very different for one user than for another
user with the same solution. The healthcare professional and the patient
together are really the experts to determine whether a tool actually delivers
what was expected. And yes, gathering of evidence, data is needed. But you must
never exclude the objective therapist / prescriber who, together with the user,
look specifically at the specific resource solution. Standardization based on
the burden of proof with the large numbers therefore does not work with device
Evidence based medicine or evidence-based practice
So you assess aids in a different way than medicines. We
know that medicines can only be prescribed and used in patients if they are
proven safe and do what they promise based on results in large numbers of
patients. Appraisal of tools requires a different approach to evidence what it
does (and delivers) than a drug. Nevertheless, there is an increasingly louder
call to also assess medical devices
in the same way as medicines. A complete utopia and lacks all the functions and
functions of medical devices.
Created on May 20th 2019 02:40. Viewed 559 times.